perinoid napisał/a:I agree, that patching all U1MBs in the World is not possible. But, at the same time, it should be not that difficult to fix the firmware (if that's really a bug, which I have no idea about) and sell new cards already patched. This would make everyone happy - if there's a bug in fw, XXL should feel satisfied andpeople whould have rights to insist on patching his games to work on older, unpatched U1MBs.
I think Candle acknowledged the 'behaviour' of the hardware. You'll have to ask him why he didn't fix it in new devices. Wild guess? XXL's attitude has been so fucking obnoxious that the chance for a fix has been blown.
_tzok_ napisał/a:Life is not simple... first step is to admit, that there is a bug.
Already done, AFAIK, by Candle. XXL admits no issue, however, with his own stuff, so has not even broached that first step.
So do you prefer simple, or fair solutions?
If you think it's fair to deliberately exploit a quirk of U1MB for no practical reason other than to make your software crash on the machine, I don't know what to say. I simply do not know what point is being made here, other than an ideological objection to a certain vendor or designer.
I have no doubts that, as the bug is known, it should be corrected. I'm aware that manufacturer/distributor may be afraid to admit, that there is a bug, because it could mean, that he had to correct it on his cost (at least for units, which are still within the warranty period) - by replacing or reprogramming the units.
Certainly I can't understand why one would not fix a bug unless the well had already been poisoned by politics, which I think is what happened here.
XXL seems to be a little too proud to give up, but so do the U1MB developers.
Note that the U1MB CPLD side of things has nothing to do with me. I consider exploitation of the issue to be incredibly childish, however.
I'm pretty sure, if the U1MB developers would publicly acknowledge that there is a bug in the U1MB, relesed a patched/corrected firmware, and started selling units with this new firmware, XXL would release a patch for his software to work with a stock/not pached U1MB. The war would be over.
Possible. All I know of XXL's personality is what he projects on forums. In my experience, anyone who will go to these lengths will be hard to appease. It is not without precedent, either. He advocates illegal OS entry points, seems to consider 'NEWDEV' an aftermarket invention, and has an ethical objection to 16-bit CPUs. I would personally not be prepared to pander to someone with such complex needs. :)